Information society

The society in which a significant economic, political and cultural activity has been created, creation, distribution, utilization, integration etc. information is called information society. introduction

This notion of organized society around production, exchange and consumption of information was rendered in the nineties. In the mid-seventies, the reports of information-society in the writings of Daniel Bell's post-industrial society could be heard, but this idea was fully developed only after the explosion of global information technologies like the Internet in the nineties. The information and information-society relationship is more or less the same as between the industries and the industrial era. The existence of machines, factories and wage labor was also before the industrial era, but in the nineteenth century their centrality grew in such a way that the fundamental changes in the lives of people and their attitude changed. Information, which was always present and important, has become the regulator of human society during the last three decades due to a certain technological condition. Due to this, a specific form of social organization has developed, in which the basic source of productivity and power lies in the production, processing and broadcast of the information. Information has taken the form of the most precious and essential commodity. This does not mean that the fact that the importance of manufacturing-service and service-based economy has ended. These sectors of the economy are playing their role, but the notions of industrial society or post-industrial society are no longer the main drivers of change. Times Square, the heart of a dense information society

Some scholars insist that the phenomena of information-society should be defined in light of the emergence of information-based markets. Rather than physical labor, information based capital can generate more money. The number of information-based products is growing very fast and growing. In 1945, as many computers-power was present on the whole earth, only one greeting card is present in the greeting card. As soon as we open the newspaper printed on paper in the morning, we become the listener as well as the listener. Our eyesight not only affects the information recorded in the advertisements, but the noise coming from a small machine engaged in any advertisement is also heard promoting that product. At some point, most of the car's price was fixed on the basis of steel, but today the new Toyota car is extracted more than 70% of its informatics component. Based on the information received on the basis of market-research, the character and trends of the consumer are identified, whose conclusive influence falls on production decisions. The possibility of science is being constantly increased through the decoding of biological information. The results have come out in the Human Genome Project. Cloning and replication of information are the alternatives of each other. Information technologies have become the medium of mobility and expansion of markets and cultures.

The nation-state still struggles to control and control the land areas. Imperialist and neo-colonial campaigns are still run to exploit the resources of raw materials and cheap labor. But the struggle to be aware of information has grown a lot today. Information is a paradigm through which new trends of social development can be explained. Due to the information-based development-order, the ethical concerns related to technology related to media, medicine and surveillance have been born. The questions related to the distribution of information, the rights and the definitions of authorship are becoming increasingly controversial. These new tendencies are not only positive. Thinking is also going on among the anxieties arising due to the word of information among the thinkers. There has been a lot of concern in the social sciences about the state of the structure of knowledge in the information society.

Polarization of the debate on information society has been done. One party recognizes that this form of society has introduced them to new dimensions of independence. In such a society people will be able to be better self-confident as being more information-rich. Through the new technologies, they will get an opportunity for better participation in political and cultural issues. This side does not see any risk in technology dominance. On the contrary, the other side is pointing towards many kinds of anxieties due to information-richness and information-p . Power structures are monitoring the activities of the individual and the society by resorting to information technology, which has brought the privacy and privacy closer to the end. It is now possible to keep track of and keep track of new technology continuously. Apart from this, if the information related to our purchasing and roaming is also being submitted, then on the basis of them, we can also be known unknowingly towards a predetermined type of behavior. This side assumes that the information society is not independent. He is being controlled through a variety of decentralized networks. The first Bantham and the Ponchatikon concept that Fuku has rendered, is fully applicable to the conditions of information-society.

The information-society's most well-known theorist, Manuel Castellels, whose creation The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, has introduced this suffix. With the discussions of Castelles, there is no satisfactory answer to this question that what is the situation of the structures of knowledge in the information society. He defines information and knowledge based on the thinking (Daniel Bell: The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, Fritz Markup: The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Mark Porat: The Information Economy), from 1962 to 1977 Came to light in between. Marshall McLuhan's theory of media was also published in the sixties. According to the definitions given by this scripture, knowledge is based on information (systematic facts and content) and the information can not be understood by cutting it from the technology that is produced and circulated. Consequently, technological conditions affect the structure of knowledge deeply. If the discussions are correct, then the question arises that any sudden change in information technology will change knowledge in society? Joe-Fresno Lytor also had a stunning observation in his composition postmodern condition published in 1979 that knowledge of computerized capitalism can not be changed without changing. Loyot had seen at the same time that knowledge is becoming 'informative merchandise'. Digitalization has transformed knowledge into pieces of information, and those bits can be processed on machines and broadcast with a fast track. In this way, in the eyes of Lytar, the information becomes the form of knowledge which is designed to circulate through the channel so that it can be effective or operational. In this sense, this form of knowledge is not philosophical, it is demonstrable and productive. MacLuhan is saying the same thing in such a way that information is a non-insignificant code or data that is produced like small TV short bytes of the TV and the man whose consumption is consumed like machines.

Considering such a worrisome situation of knowledge in information-society, Scott Lash has made a difference in knowledge based on knowledge and technological information based knowledge in his composition Critique of Information. According to Lash, the narrative-based knowledge demands meditation and meditation with endurance, while the new form of knowledge, the faster it appears, becomes as fast as possible. In this sense, lash considers information as a constructive rather than a representational one. Information is the name of an 'unconscious factuality'. This nature gives difficulties for the theorists of society and culture. There is no chance of developing their criticism by staying away from the laws of information-society. That is why they must first re-think the basic concepts that define culture and society. These assumptions are not proven effective within the information-society due to the production of declarative knowledge. Also see them

1. Manuel Casselles (1996), The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Blackwell, Oxford, Volume 1.

2. Jean-François Lautor (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, University of Manchester Press, Manchester.

3. Mark Porat (1977), The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement, US Department of Commerce, Washington DC.

4. Scott Lash (2002), Critique of Information, Sage, London.

wiki